Fun Stuff > BAND
Bands who you only really need to own a Best Of for...
Inlander:
Just in general. He's a contrarian.
Gryff:
Well, I could be more specific. If you're into that.
I would say that Nick Cave and REM cannot possibly be done justice in a best of, and I would say that most of your other choices do not deserve one!
Well, that's probably a bit harsh, but why would anyone need a Grinspoon best of? Or the Darkness, for that matter.
Anyway, what it boils down to is that my taste in music is much better than yours.
valley_parade:
--- Quote from: KharBevNor ---Motorhead - The Very Best of Motorhead.
Because it really does have almost every great track they've ever done, and a lot of interesting side-material, which endeared it to me (A Hawkwind and a Headgirl track, and Girlschools cover of bomber, for example.)
--- End quote ---
What the hell ass lame copy of The Very Best of Motorhead do I own? Mine doesn't have any covers of Bomber, or the like.
E. Spaceman:
--- Quote from: Gryff ---Well, I hate to break it to you, E. Spaceman, but your opinion is WRONG!
--- End quote ---
OK, MUSIC FIGHT IS Go!!!!!!!!!!!!! (since we are talking about The Smiths this will be a match fought with handbags)
The Best of series includes every single song in the Singles album and more, incuding the unedited version of Rubber Ring, so clearly my opinion is better.
I've got a summary for you Gryff:
1.- I'm right
2.- You eat dong
Gryff:
Yes, but the Singles has far better sequencing and the most essential tracks. If you want all the obscure tracks then you just need to get Louder Than Bombs to complement the albums.
As a summary of their career, the Singles works better.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version