Fun Stuff > ENJOY
The new X-men(HELLA SPOILERS!)
KharBevNor:
Curious, that would seem to contradict my first hypothesis of Wikipedia usefulness, which states that the amount of import a wikipedia article has to world affairs and mainstream intellectual life is directly inverse to its quality, which explains why Wikipedias biography of Spider-Woman is three times longer and more minutely accurate than its biography of Count Sergei Witte.
AceGun:
x-men 2099? One of many pretty lame attempts at showing the Marvel universe in the future. I have the first couple issues of x-men 2099, but I haven't read them in a very long time. Most likely because they just aren't very good. They really had nothing to do with x-men other than the fact that it was about some mutants.
Luke C:
I quite enjoyed it...
_:
--- Quote from: Spinless ---
What can you guys tell me about Xmen 2099? Wikipedia has NOTHING.
--- End quote ---
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X-Men_2099
--- Quote from: poetically bored ---It's Earth 616, I think, not 161.
--- End quote ---
616 is correct. Thank you, Alan Moore.
In related news, this film was absolute gargbage, both from a film buff standpoint and a comic fan standpoint. I think the only mindset it could possibly be enjoyed in is the 'OOOH EXPLOSIONS AND PUNCHING, KEEN' frame of mind.
KharBevNor:
Is there another frame of mind to choose?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version