Fun Stuff > BAND
there are few things worse in the world than people
AceGun:
what does sufjan stevens have to do with anything? And how does listening to him prevent me from obtaining a hard-on?
if it is true though, i will avoid listening to Sufjan. what music can you suggest that will increase my hard-on producing capabilities?
other topic:
MMM is not a fun album to listen to, but i'm still glad it exists. its existence prevents people from ever making the same mistake. at least, i hope it works like that.
oh aaaadddison:
the thing is, im a chick.
i am a chick with a tight fucking pussy that you couldnt penetrate if you tried.
and i am sick and TIRED of not having any male penetrate my tight, wet, cunt.
i have not YET met a man who listens to indie music. i have been to america, britain, canada, australia.
every time ive fucked an indie boy he couldnt even do shit.
then i'll go and fuck someone who listens to alan jackson or i dunno MATCHBOX 20, some guy with a baseball cap, tight muscles and a short hair-cut. he sticks it in me with the confidence of a MAN.
the difference between a man who listens to matchbox 20 and a boy who listens to ANY NORWEGIAN BAND is pretty fucking vast.
you fucks are going to have 18 year old kids fucking your wives when you are 40.
you should learn to enjoy it at least if you are going to be pathetic. i mean, just wallow in it. maybe you should just give up and realize how weak and unevolved you are.
TrueNeutral:
I'm confused. Aren't people who listen to garage bands like The Strokes just indie people, except with bad taste? Hell, garage music was indie until recently.
Also, what movies are you in? You sound like a porn star.
...it's kinda turning me on.
oh aaaadddison:
how are the strokes a garage band? they didnt start out playing in a garage and they dont currently play in a garage
Chad K.:
I'm having trouble seeing a connection between liking certain musical artists and being a "beta male". Moreover, it appears your entire post has been an attempt to strawman something as large and amorphous as "indie culture" into a single stereotype which you then attack, without providing so much as a single alternative to that stereotype. Would you care at any point to take an actual position as to what makes a work of art or particular person have or lack value? Or were you intending to keep spouting off like an unruly high schooler?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version