Fun Stuff > CHATTER
YOU! YOU BETTER NOT BE SOBER
Dimmukane:
man I think I am some kind of hybrid stereotype
maybe my name could be Amorphous Man
Drill King:
Yeah Joe, at least you ain't the ho' of the board.
onewheelwizzard:
I'm not going to pretend to be a forums whipping boy, and it's not even like some good-natured ribbing isn't in order when I belabor the same points again and again. I'm just pointing it out because I still remember this post.
Ozy, don't worry, I don't mind catching a little bit of stereotype every now and then, and I think you're an OK dude. It's just that sometimes you seem to be a bit knee-jerk about this kind of thing.
Ozymandias:
Yeah maybe I was glib there but man I got to say that when a dude who loves his chemicals cites people who are looking for reasons those chemicals should be legal maybe there is a little bit of bias there towards overstatement of their potential.
Especially when corporate conspiracies enter the picture as for why the stuff is illegal.
onewheelwizzard:
It would've been boring if I was just like "it's just reefer madness all over again and enough people are drug-phobic that nobody cares about whether or not the stuff's actually dangerous," though. I mean, that's the real reason, of course, there aren't any corporate conspiracies necessary for that, but there's nothing exciting about it. It's kind of like if someone was like "why is the drinking age 21 when you can join the military and get trained to kill people for your country at 18" and I'd said something about the military-industrial complex and Vietnam.
That said, if the DEA were to mysteriously reverse their stance on MDMA for the sake of all the PTSD sufferers out there (not likely), a lot of money WOULD stop moving around and a lot of powerful people would take steps to push things back to the way they used to be.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version