Fun Stuff > ENJOY
HBO's A Song of Ice and Fire
satsugaikaze:
Yeah Emilia Clarke has a very dramatic angryfeis
Don't think that'll change come this second season
Lines:
My favorite is the third one down. It almost looks like she's hissing.
@TheFuriousWombat: I feel the same way. About half of what was in books 4 and 5 would have made one really good book, but instead it's two overly long and somewhat boring books. He really could have left a lot of that stuff out. (And gotten rid of so many of Cersei's chapters.)
IrrationalPie:
I'm guessing they'll combine books four and five and split them into two seasons with chronological events.
This is all assuming the show is picked up after Season 2, 3 and 4 (Book 3 was already said to become two seperate seasons).
TheFuriousWombat:
Hmm, that sounds likely, yeah. In the "afterward" of Feast, Martin writes something about how he didn't think it made sense for him to tell half the stories of all the characters in that book and then the second half in book 5. I really don't get why. Pretty much every series I can think of does it that way and it's always worked. I would imagine it had more to do with the fact that he was having trouble writing more of the story in any case and it was easier for him to take the approach he did - a theory further supported by the, what, six years between Feast and Dance? So yeah, doing Storm as two seasons makes sense because it's massive and then doing Feast/Dance chronologically in two seasons would be the most logical way to go forward. Plus for the show a massive amount will be cut, and rightly so, tightening up the whole sequence of events significantly. I would guess it will run up to that point at least. Six seasons isn't unreasonable at all for a very popular HBO series and Game season 1 was a major success.
By then (5 years from now), book six will probably be done, right?
IrrationalPie:
First Season two review is in : A-
http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,20470532_20580368,00.html
The review has very little substance to it. There isn't any 'This actor's performance was outstanding . . ', 'what I liked about . .' or 'what I disliked . . '.
Why even write a review?
In fact, I could write a similar review without even having watched the second season.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version