Fun Stuff > BAND

New Radiohead Album "In Rainbows"

<< < (15/22) > >>

pat101:
on my first listen I really liked it, very diverse musically which I enjoyed.

and yes it's only in 160, which sucks.

TheFuriousWombat:
I personally think it's great but I need more listens for it to truly sink in. There's a lot of really excellent tracks on here, however. In regards to the length, it's about a minute shorter than 'OK Computer' and it's longer than 'Amnesiac' and 'Kid A' by about 5 minutes each so it seems to me that the length is fitting. Only 'The Bends' and 'Hail to Thief' are longer and both of those albums have songs which could easily be cut out without hurting, and possibly with improving, upon the album. I really have no idea how long 'Pablo Honey' is.

Joseph:
Actually, it's the shortest Radiohead album.  Every single other Radiohead album is longer.  I'm not sure how you've been counting album length here.  Amnesiac is close, but is longer by a minute.  Well, if you don't include the acoustic version of 'Creep' on Pablo Honey, then it's a bit shorter, but that's it.

TheFuriousWombat:
Oh shit, you're right. I was looking at my CD rips on my computer and was looking at bitrates instead of actual album length. My mistake. Either way though, it's only a couple of minutes shorter than most of their other albums. I will admit one more song would have been nice though. It does feel a tiny bit short.

Thrillho:
Well lucky for me, I'm getting the big-ass version so I'll get a second disc's worth to masturbate over.

However, I'm getting the download for free now anyway. I just can't wait any more, it's been more than four years as it is and they'll get plenty of money from me later.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version