Fun Stuff > BAND

QC Music Blog discussion thread

<< < (2/46) > >>

Ishotdanieljohnston:
Oh really? Shit, sorry man, I thought you were a Melbournian.

dalconnsuch:
i actually really liked the dirty three's work from now and from then, i think they're good at painting an audio picture in my head

of course thats me

Inlander:
Went out to see a band, got inspired, came home, re-wrote it.

Jackie Blue:
I'm as gay for Dirty Three as you are but really, the article is just going on and on about how awesome they sound.  It would help if you gave some context about their sound in relation to other music.  If someone had never heard the band I'm not sure they'd get a whole lot out of your descriptions of thier sound, other than that they're really cool and they have violins and sometimes they are noisy.

I'm not trying to be a dick, but when someone asks for my opinion I feel compelled to be completely honest.

Inlander:
To be honest, I'm not trying to describe their sound and I think it would be completely pointless to do so. If somebody's never heard a band before, and they've got an internet connection, then the absolute last resource they're going to use to find out what that band's work sounds like is a blog. I'm more interested in what makes each of the band's albums different from the last, and the relative merits of those albums. Everything else in the article is "human interest" stuff to hopefully make it more interesting to read.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page