Fun Stuff > CHATTER
Bill C-10, Canadian censorship.
Uber Ritter:
--- Quote from: KharBevNor on 04 Mar 2008, 17:58 ---
Fun fact! That's still not actually a law. There's a version of it tacked on to another bill that's still in Lords Committees.
I find the idea ridiculous and dangerous. Censoring the production of material which, at the end of the day, harms absolutely no-one, is bad enough, but criminalising the very possession?
--- End quote ---
Ah, I didn't know that. Shows me up for being an American, I guess. That's good to hear, at least.
valley_parade:
--- Quote from: KharBevNor on 04 Mar 2008, 17:58 ---still in Lords Committees
--- End quote ---
read: Lords are just sitting around watching porn all day.
negative creep:
Oh man, I'm really sorry to hear that.
Mycroft:
My first post, probably not the best way to make an introduction, but the topic caught my eye.
I believe that the entire situation can be summed up as follows:
Refusal to fund does not equal censorship.
The term censorship has a specific meaning, and Bill C-10 does not fit that definition at all.
Boro_Bandito:
Edited: for immediately feeling like an inadequate response the moment I posted it.
You are a bit of a douchebag. There, that feels better.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version