Fun Stuff > CHATTER

Ridiculous Decadency

<< < (43/127) > >>

Lunchbox:
A better example would be perhaps Calvin Klein vs Bonds underwear. Both are good, solid products, well made and long-lasting, but the Bonds ones are ten bucks where the CK ones are sixty.

Jimmy the Squid:
I should have done that. Shit I even wear bonds!

Let's face it people, I am bad at fashion.

SeanBateman:
I was just about to say you were bad at fashion, actually. Not even in a negative sense, you just clearly do not understand why people who care about fashion care about fashion.

I don't really feel like explaining it, either. Suffice to say you are paying for a lot more than the name "Armani"

Jimmy the Squid:
That's ok! I'm not actually interested in finding out. I am happy to wear very entry-level suits and look reasonable. I don't need $200 shirts simply because I just don't care that much about fashion, I have better things to spend my money on at the moment.

It is entirely possible that once I actually get a real job making proper money I will wear fancy clothes but until then I get my shirts from Lowes (discount mens retailer), my pants from Army Surplus stores and...well I do like expensive boots so I guess that's something.

Patrick:
Not being decadent = why are you in a thread about decadence

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version