Fun Stuff > ENJOY

The Eighth Harry Potter Movie

<< < (5/18) > >>

ThePQ4:
--Fixed.
I can't spell. Jeez.

0bsessions:
There's still plenty to add. Most importantly, unless they plan to change the title, they need to include the Deathly Hallows...

They also need to cover the Horcruxes and tidy up some of the loose ends and plot holes left over by shit that was cut from the prior movies (Such as Kreacher taking Regulus' locket and covering what the Hell happened to Barty Crouch Jr.). In order to avoid cutting too much from Half Blood Prince, they'll have to hold a lot of stuff over until Deathly Hallows makes it to the screen.

In terms of ages...you people do realize that principle filming will be long since done for both of them before the first one even sees the screen? Radcliffe will likely be twenty when they finish up (In order to get everything done for December 2010, they'd probably have to finish up summer of 2010 when he's about to turn 21), which is definitely reasonable in terms of playing a seventeen year old. Shit, I'm about a week shy of twenty-four and I can pass for seventeen when I shave.

Lines:
Considering I'm the same height as I was when I was 17, with a bit of make-up and different clothes, I could pass for my younger self. At least he's not like...10 years senior of his character.

And it's not like they can't add things to the newer movies for explanation, I think they should have just done it sooner with the first 5 movies. It's ok to have a movie that's 3 hours long! No, I do not want to sit in a theater for more than that, but would I have gotten the DVDs with all the stuff you had to cut out? HECK YES! It would satisfy my nerdish tendencies! (And no, a few deleted scenes that you can watch in the extras section is not an extended version.) I know the constraints with translating a book into a movie, but there are some key things in every one of them that there was plenty of time to explain. GoF would have been better spent explaining the Crouch's instead of having some long dragon chase which was about a page in the book. The first two movies were more successful because the books were shorter, so cutting stuff was easier, but when you cut things, it's kind of silly to cut or change the things that really matter.

Oh, and if they play up the Dumbledore being gay thing in the last movie, I will find the director and the screen writer/s and slap them for their shenanigans.

ThePQ4:
Apparently Micheal Gambon has been hamming up the gay-thing off-scene, but he's pretty much business in front of the camera.
I don't think they'll mess with that. Dumbeldore is a dignified character. You can't just suddenly make him every stereotype.

Ozymandias:
Average age of people in this thread: 20(at least)
Average age of target demographic of Harry Potter movies: 14(at most)
Amount of people over the age of the target demographic who think they are the target demographic because they argue about it on the internet obsessively: An internet's worth.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page