Fun Stuff > CHATTER

The Great Porn Debate

<< < (17/51) > >>

Darkbluerabbit:

--- Quote from: muteKi on 23 Apr 2008, 21:19 ---This is why I only look for lez porns and such if I do so. If I really want to explore the specifically male body parts I can do so with my own.

--- End quote ---

I wish there was more "lesbian" porn with women who are genuinely into women and not just putting on a show. 

muteKi:
Interestingly enough, a lot of the lez porn I look at is totally staged (Lightspeed Girls).

I think I prefer my porn to be as nonsexual as possible.


(Of course, I love nudes. I just found a bunch of alt-nude torrents. That said, some such sites have some bad reputations of their own. I was exploring how SuicideGirls tried to destroy the careers of any models that did stuff for competing sites and such the other day as well.)

calenlass:
So there is this really awesome lesbian scene at the end of that Pirates movie that came out a couple of years ago. Holy fucking shit.


That is my entire opinion on the subject.

LordNagash:
I think a good way to explore the topic would be to remove some elements of porn and see how it changes the perception of it. What if instead of sex, porn consisted of two (or more) people (usually a male and female) eating a dinner together. Most of the time a man would get a bigger share, and it would focus on when he finishes the meal, and likely not show any partner(s) finishing their meal (possibly not eating it much at all.) Some people might like different meals to be eaten, and some extreme ones could involve force feeding or some other violent twists.

Would you feel the same way about it? Obviously it would likely not be very popular, but would perception of the videos change?

I do not mean to promote any particular 'side', I just though this might be an interesting exercise.

Tom:
Isn't that like... 17th century puritan porn. How scandalous?!  :-o

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version