Fun Stuff > ENJOY

The Dark Knight (SPOILERS START ON PAGE 3)

<< < (30/88) > >>

KvP:
I really liked Eckhart in this one, I just feel that his arc was too squashed (perhaps truncated, there's gotta be a 3 or 4 hour cut of this movie out there somewheres) he certainly shows a dark side, but I didn't buy his two stages of grief (crying in bed and then homicidal rage dictated by coin-tosses). and he was obviously discarded far too quickly.

Lines:
I've skipped over all the spoilers and am going back to the discussion for Bane and I have to say it - every actor suggestion just doesn't seem right for that character. Like Jon said earlier, these movies are more rooted in reality and like he also said, I don't think the dude needs to be super huge in order to be considered strong. If the actor they choose (if they choose Bane) is built well enough and can fit the character, I don't think size will matter. Someone like Mickey Rourke would be cool, but I think Rourke himself is too old.

Also, I hated the look of Bane in B&R, so I'm hoping for a whole new look. Nolan did it very well with Scarecrow so I think he could with others.

Vendetagainst:
I am sorry if this appears out-of-context to the current conversation (I am not reading page 3 because I haven't seen the movie) but the next movie will almost certainly not have the penguin because the directors want villains that have not been frequently used before.

Lines:
That makes no sense considering the recent movie has the Joker and Two Face, both of which are pretty major.

Vendetagainst:
I thought the same thing.

"Prior to the release of The Dark Knight in 2008, David Goyer ruled out using the Penguin or Catwoman as a villain in a future film, preferring to use antagonists from the comic that had not yet been portrayed on the big screen."

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page