Fun Stuff > ENJOY
The Dark Knight (SPOILERS START ON PAGE 3)
Alex C:
I feel much the same way. I'm fine with the idea of more sequels, but I suspect that they'll be more like entertaining victory laps rather than character defining dramas. With this movie they really did an excellent job of defining Batman's role as a relentless vigilante taking on a thankless job for the greater good. It's a battle that doesn't really cry out for resolution, since the eternal struggle part of the equation is such an integral part of the character. I could see them perhaps exploring the "How far is he willing to go?" angle some more, but it's hard to say how much mileage they could get out of that without severely undermining the character's redeeming qualities.
Johnny C:
There wasn't a need for a second movie.
If Nolan wants to do a third, I'll personally trust that he has a good reason to do so.
Muppet King:
--- Quote from: Ozymandias on 30 Jul 2008, 09:40 ---Can I just say that I don't want a third movie?
That there doesn't really seem to be a need for it, to me.
--- End quote ---
I believe Nolan has said he doesn't intend to make a third. He said he's open to the idea, but he never planned a third. Of course my information is dated, so he could have changed his tune.
britMonster:
I had heard it is supposed to be a trilogy. Not sure where I heard that from.
But also http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0974015/
KvP:
--- Quote from: Johnny C on 30 Jul 2008, 10:47 ---There wasn't a need for a second movie.
--- End quote ---
Enh, don't know about that. Of course there wasn't a need for a sequel, but compared to the Dark Knight, Batman Begins was pretty droll. But then, I've always felt that Batman Begins was overrated.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version