Fun Stuff > CLIKC

Who else here has a boner for TURN BASED STRATEGY

(1/17) > >>

Caspian:
I am aware that this is possibly THE nerdiest type of game that you can get, but I like it a great deal anyway; the relaxed pace, the emphasis on strategy and so on and so forth.

Personally I would say that Civ III (especcially with the expansion packs) and Master of Orion 2 are the pinnacles of this genre thus far, combining the ultra nerdy micromanagement things this genre's known for with a fair bit of entertainment and accessibility. Galactic Civilizations was also pretty cool, but mainly because the tech tree was so awesome.

ANYWAY. TURN BASED STRATEGY. DISCUSS.

Dimmukane:
I suck at it hard. (I have trouble beating 5 other AI players on Settler difficulty in Civ 4)  But I love Civ 4 to death.  I just need to get accustomed to focusing on fewer aspects of my empire.  I end up getting spread far too thin for me to be any good.

KickThatBathProf:
I've always been a fan of Fire Emblem

Surgoshan:
I'll agree on MoO2.  I prefer Civ 4 to 3, though.  Lots of hidden numbers in that game.  I'm sorry, but a raw spearman should never beat a veteran tank.

Shreazla:
I personally enjoy Fire Emblem myself, as well as Risk and chess (though I doubt the last one fits what the author intended when he said turn based strategy, it is the epitome of said type of game).  I've also become slightly addicted to a Flash MMORPG called Dofus, which I randomly found online - it's turn based to a certain degree, and is a good time waster - Overall, yes, Turnbased strategy is still amazing; it just needs to be revamped every once in a while (like Fire emblem did).

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

Go to full version