Fun Stuff > ENJOY

Exciting Sequel News

<< < (21/21)

Sox:

--- Quote from: Johnny C on 26 Jun 2008, 17:31 ---Let's play Rank!


* Connery
* Craig
* Dalton
* Lazenby
* Brosnan
* Moore
--- End quote ---

This is easy. You work by track record. Good to bad movies ratio in their simplest forms and turned into into a scale. It works like this.
Craig
Dalton
Lazenby
Brosnan
Connery
Moore

There's waffles. Of course, there's always waffles. You had good Bonds in movies filled with bullshit, and bad Bonds in decent movies. This method is based on consistency, so it favours actors that had the fewest movies. This perhaps puts Lazenby a little higher than he should be, I can't be sure, I haven't seen his movie in years.

Surgoshan:
That method doesn't favor the actors with fewer films; if Lazenby's one movie had sucked balls, he'd be at the bottom of the list.  It all works out.

TheFuriousWombat:
Lazenby's Bond was clumsy, oafish, unattractive, and the antithesis of suave. In other words, he's no Bond.

Surgoshan:

--- Quote from: TheFuriousWombat on 28 Jun 2008, 21:39 ---Lazenby's Bond was clumsy, oafish, unattractive, and the antithesis of suave. In other words, he's no Bond.

--- End quote ---

On the other hand, you might recall the fat, ugly dumbass who tripped on a vagina.

Sometimes fiction upsets us... perhaps THE AUTHOR wanted us to appreciate random bullshit.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page