Fun Stuff > CLIKC
Diablo 3
Zanzan:
--- Quote from: est on 15 Oct 2008, 22:51 ---Oh god, I am not sure if he qualifies as the hardest boss, but the fallen seraphim in Hell is annoying as all hell because he has a gazillion hitpoints and is resistant to most things. It took me forever to kill the bastard.
Also:
Weee!
--- End quote ---
That's now my wallpaper! Yay!
Anyway, dug my D2 CDs out of cryo-storage and started playing a week ago when I heard about D3 being announced. Already in Hell mode ... damn Blizzard.
Boro_Bandito:
I pity da fool who doesn't read the whole topic and then posts without contributing anything to the conversation anyway.
I don't think they'll create a monthly charge for Battle.net with Diablo 3 simply because with it there will come the expectation of it being updated regularly for new content. Monthly pay for MMOs with new content added regularly works because they aren't following a linear storyline. Diablo has always been a pretty standard RPG hack-n-slash in that it follows a pretty linear quest path with a very clear game end, even with the LoD expansion. I agree with Obsessions, I'm betting it makes more sense to release the game, have free B.net and release a couple expansions, then ignore the game for another ten years, heh.
Dazed:
Also, amongst the reasons they charged monthly for WoW service was that it's hosted server-side. Battle.net, I'm pretty certain, has always been hosted client-side. So, really, given that Battle.net has always been free, and given the reasons Jon and Boro etc just stated, to start charging for it now would create a massive PR shitstorm that I'm sure they don't want to deal with.
Felrender:
I actually want to play the Archivist, joke or not.
LORENADO!
Beren:
It's already been stated that Battle.net will remain free for both D3 and the upcoming SC2.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version