Fun Stuff > CHATTER
Man sued for getting cold feet (twice)
Aimless:
No no I was only addressing the implication that he did the right thing because she's some sort of ultra-vindictive demon bitch. I think he did the wrong thing proposing to her in the first place :o
ForteBass:
So you're saying he knew he was going to back out from the very beginning...?
snalin:
Quote: “Really, we believe now that he never intended to follow through on the promise to marry,” Sartain added.
If he never intended to marry her, and made her lose 50k a year in wages, then yes, he had it coming.
Elizzybeth:
I don't understand why they believe that. What could he possibly have had to gain from pretending to want to marry her? Both sides agree that he knew she had at least some debt, so it's not as though he thought he'd be benefitting financially. The $30,000 he gave her and money from the 2-carat ring could have bought a lot of whores in Vegas, if that was his game. It just doesn't make sense.
Chesire Cat:
I agree with the ruling. You have the right to protect your investment, just because he didnt sign a binding contract doesnt mean he is free from obligation. Marriages are expensive, he had plenty of time to stop it, but they day of... twice, is not acceptable. Now I will say that this ruling sets a shitty precedent because this is an extreme case.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version