Comic Discussion > QUESTIONABLE CONTENT

Cogito Ergo Nom

(1/12) > >>

JReynolds:
I checked out the new t-shirt that's coming out: http://www.questionablecontent.net/merch.php

It probably says something about my thought processes that my first thought was: "I hope that those are raisins in the cookie that the cat is eating. Chocolate is poisonous to cats."

Then I thought: is chocolate poison to cats? I think I read it somewhere, but I'm not 100% on it.

Then I thought: since the cat is wearing safety goggles and a lab coat, and is standing up, perhaps this is a sapient cat, genetic-engineered to tolerate, or even enjoy, chocolate.

Thus did I muse. Also: cute t-shirt design.

Vendetagainst:
Chocolate is quite toxic to almost all animals, including the closely-related great apes.

mustang6172:
My first thought is that it's a not so subtle Garfield reference.

Mad Cat:
Chocolate only kills... those between me and it.

Honestly, the question is not whether or not chocolate is toxic to animals. It's toxic to EVERYTHING. The question is, to a given animal, it's toxic in what dosage?

Humans have the right enzymes to break it down rather effectively, so it takes an ungodly amount to kill us. I know. I've tried.

Dogs, cats, and other vermin lack those enzymes and so can only survive rather small doses.

Tybalt:
OP, I want to have your brain.  That is just the weirdest reaction.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

Go to full version