Fun Stuff > BAND

Horrible bands that time forgot

<< < (98/103) > >>

öde:

--- Quote from: MrBlu on 20 Feb 2009, 12:09 ---Yeah. I don't think anyone down here actually listens to the stuff, ironically.
--- End quote ---

I thought dubstep was more of a London thing.

Lummer:

--- Quote from: Ballard on 20 Feb 2009, 13:21 ---None of those hair metal bands are all that awful. Unbelievably tacky (I'm sure there was a degree of self-awareness in that, though) and lacking creativity but shit I will listen to them over the rest of the stuff in this thread any day.

In fact L.A. Guns are fucking solid.

--- End quote ---

Motley Crue have some unbelievably good songs too.

BeoPuppy:
Motley Crue are definite proof that this is an unfair universe by virtue of the fact that they did not manage to die from overdoses and so many great artists did. But that is a different discussion.

Also: I think my remarks need to be taken into context. Yes, maybe, these bands did create some okay music (emphasis on 'some') but the godawful wading through maybe, sometimes, sort of okay glam and rock tracks before something cool came on just ruined their music.   

MrBlu:

--- Quote from: öde on 23 Feb 2009, 15:43 ---
--- Quote from: MrBlu on 20 Feb 2009, 12:09 ---Yeah. I don't think anyone down here actually listens to the stuff, ironically.
--- End quote ---

I thought dubstep was more of a London thing.

--- End quote ---
Well if you go to a hotel here, you'll mainly only hear techno.

Rez:
They weren't really horrible, just derivative (The Bends era imitators), but what the fuck happened to Longpigs?

Also, Monaco. Anyone remember Monaco?

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version