Fun Stuff > CLIKC
Random Web Design Thread Appeared!
J-cob9000:
Oh. You're right. It is one of his pictures. I meant to contact him and ask permission after sort of finalizing the design. I forgot but I will change the picture if he has anything against me using it.
Catfish_Man:
--- Quote from: dennis on 28 Dec 2008, 01:21 ---Design for XHTML 1.0.
--- End quote ---
Thread derailing time.
No, don't. The *one and only benefit* of XHTML is that it's XML (a rather dubious benefit anyway). But, if you actually use XML, Internet Explorer will barf. So you'll have to tell the browser it's text/html instead. At that point you've lost the one benefit, and odds are you're not even going to be using valid XML since your tools will be parsing as HTML and won't catch things like missing CDATA blocks.
In conclusion, please do validate your pages and attempt to use good design and development practices, but stick to HTML in 99.9% of cases.
mishy:
ty catfish man. i didn't know that about IE & XML. (not sarcasm.)
i r learning tings in dis thread. ty for creating the thread, midnight. :)
Cicero:
Sites suck. I do web design for a living and there is no quality here.
mishy:
hrmm.. Cicero... i think you've posted the definition of "pointless criticism". try "constructive criticism" now or don't bother posting. (i second Jeans's comment.)
maybe i'm still too "plantmonster" to be that harsh and get away with it, but i actually feel minorly offended by Cicero's purely negative comments in the middle of a constructive conversation. he might as well have told us all to sod off...
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version