Fun Stuff > CHATTER
Dire warnings of the apocalypse mistaken for prank
SilentJ:
Zombie games have skewed my vision on what a zombie apocalypse would be like. A rifle would work well at range, but in a post-apocalyptic world, you're not fighting zombies at range, them bitches are right up on you. Therefore fuck your rifles and handguns, I'm going with one of these.
Nodaisho:
I am unsure of the reliability of the AA12, I'd rather have the Saiga-12. The reason I would go for a rifle is weight. Shotgun shells are heavy all get-out, at least an ounce, usually at least an ounce and a quarter of lead, for each shot, ignoring the powder, primer, wad, and case. Assuming you need a headshot, the zombie will be just as dead with one rifle round in it as a dozen balls of 00 buck. it is probably easier to get a headshot with a shotgun, but not very much easier. Some sort of reflex sight or red dot would make it easier as well, but I would be worried about batteries with most of them, I'd want something that didn't use batteries, maybe tritium, both on the iron sights of my pistol, irons of my rifle, and the glass on the rifle.
edit: Oh, if you were thinking the shaolin spade was something actually similar to a spade (I did), go for an entrenching tool. Works as a shovel, a blunt instrument, and a sharp weapon.
Josefbugman:
yeah, but the shaolin spade is lighter, with longer reach and you can use both ends on the living dead.
Also if its fast zombies your up against? Head for the sea and live on an oil rig, they will burn out faster than your usual shufflers.
clockworkjames:
Go nuts, this gets fun.
Jace:
I guess if you want to hit zombies in the head with a piece of metal, then yes, it would work better, but you will not be severing anything whatsoever when using a monks spade. It is not a sharp object. You can use it all you want. I'll use a quan dao or nan dao
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version