Comic Discussion > QUESTIONABLE CONTENT
Oh, Sven ...
lolwut:
--- Quote from: SrMeowMeow on 10 Feb 2009, 09:10 ---It's not invalid though, even if it is subjective. For example, I'm a lot more comfortable with a black rapper using the N word than a white rapper.
Look, this really isn't a big deal to me. I just resent the implication that my opinion is invalid because you disagree.
--- End quote ---
the point is invalid because it's entirely subjective, not because i disagree
it's like saying "green is better than blue" and then when asked why you say "because i like green more"
--- Quote from: The_Bartender on 10 Feb 2009, 15:50 ---For the sarcasm challenged, the preceding was sarcasm, tinged with irony, intended to be humor. Or maybe it was humour, with a touch of sarcasm, meant to be ironic.
O hell, whatever!
--- End quote ---
sarcasm is a form of irony
viatriphop:
I think Martin may go back and form reality from his dream and cheat on Dora with the love seat. meanwhile a fight happens between them and they break up. Martin gets a sex change and Dora decides to get one as well. Then they get back together. Faye and Sven end up killing each other mob style and his intern gets the insurance money.
Hanners ends up going to a mental hospital because she accidentally wet the bed while drunk and was never seen again.
And all the computer friends die in a fire. DIAF
OHHHHHHHHHH SNAP
lolwut:
who the fuck is martin
SrMeowMeow:
--- Quote from: lolwut on 13 Feb 2009, 05:46 ---the point is invalid because it's entirely subjective, not because i disagree
it's like saying "green is better than blue" and then when asked why you say "because i like green more
--- End quote ---
No, it's like you saying "green is better than blue", me saying "blue is better than green", and those both being opinions.
The blanket statement that "all forms of humor should be equal" or "perspective shouldn't matter" is not somehow true on its own merits.
Seriously, can we just let it go? I feel like a tool arguing this much about the content of a comic. I just am unwilling to see it end on the note of you saying me being wrong is somehow fact. I'm just stubborn, I guess. Can we agree to disagree?
lolwut:
--- Quote from: SrMeowMeow on 13 Feb 2009, 09:34 ---
--- Quote from: lolwut on 13 Feb 2009, 05:46 ---the point is invalid because it's entirely subjective, not because i disagree
it's like saying "green is better than blue" and then when asked why you say "because i like green more
--- End quote ---
No, it's like you saying "green is better than blue", me saying "blue is better than green", and those both being opinions.
The blanket statement that "all forms of humor should be equal" or "perspective shouldn't matter" is not somehow true on its own merits.
Seriously, can we just let it go? I feel like a tool arguing this much about the content of a comic. I just am unwilling to see it end on the note of you saying me being wrong is somehow fact. I'm just stubborn, I guess. Can we agree to disagree?
--- End quote ---
man i'm not going to let you get the last word on this if you keep saying that your reasoning being entirely subjective doesn't invalidate your argument
don't make me do it
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version