Comic Discussion > QUESTIONABLE CONTENT
Dora will be the most damaged.
TheViscount:
Dude, Hanners has OCD for germs and shit, she`s not going to be crazy in bed. Well she is, but not in the way you want, you freaks.
But I do agree, crazy chick = crazy sex. I mean, to some degree.
I don`t think Dora will get the shit end of this, if you`re talking about who will get the worst out of it. Dora will get her share, but I think Faye will be on the shit end and emerge stronger than before in the next arc.
Headwoünd:
The OP must be so delighted seeing how his point has grown into such a rich consensus.
Who wouldn't be, with all the 100% serious, objective and airtight (*WINK*) argumentation regarding crazy lady bombshells and their effect on the cock accompanied by people who need a trolling so desperately that they create their very own personal trolls.
I know I am. :>
Aphanisis:
--- Quote from: PantsFTW on 18 Feb 2009, 09:28 ---I would say that Dora is the most damaged, with the amount that she loves sex I haven't met a girl who isn't damaged.
--- End quote ---
Long-time/First-time. If I can weigh in on this topic, I think I understand what you mean about girls' issues and sexual prowess. But isn't it just as likely that this has more to do with some sort of sexist self-fulfilling prophecy? To wit: You sleep with a girl who's really good in bed; at first it's awesome; then it begins to challenge your culturally-engrained Madonna/Whore belief that if she's enjoying it that much, there must be something wrong with her - she's morally corrupt or whatever you want to call it. But the point is that her sexual enjoyment begins to define itself in your mind as evidence of craziness and issues. Then, absolutely any non-sexual behavior of hers that doesn't fall into your definition of "normal" is exacerbated by the fact that she's highly sexual.
In other words, it's not that crazy girls are good in bed; it's that through the distorted perception of our borderline-misogynistic male egos, a woman being good in bed is evidence of her craziness.
Norton Quintessential:
Best LTR/FTW I've read in a while, Aphanisis.
Mr. Skawronska:
--- Quote ---Hey, I notice you deliberately omitted the part where I said that your posts were sexist.
--- End quote ---
You win a cookie.
--- Quote ---In other words, it's not that crazy girls are good in bed; it's that through the distorted perception of our borderline-misogynistic male egos, a woman being good in bed is evidence of her craziness.
--- End quote ---
That's an interesting analysis. And I won't deny that it could very well be true, considering I myself am male and I've got my share of distortions, some of them possibly misogynistic.
However,
I'd like to offer the theorem that a woman being good in bed (for that matter, ANYONE being good in bed) is the ability to abandon self-restraint and hedonistically enjoy pleasure.
This could also explain why sex for some folks is better when they're drunk; Some people are just too uptight to enjoy sex because their own "nearly automatic" self-restraints prevent them from doing so.
Crazy folks, that is, folks whose behaviors lie significantly outside the statistical norm (whatever that may be as determined by both society and by the witch-doctors--er, I mean psychologists--of that society, indicate that possibly the level of self-restraint a person exercises/is capable of both affects what could be considered deviant behavior AND the enjoyment of sex.
Or it could just be simpler than that: People classified as "Crazy" are folks who are more pleasure oriented, and thus, give and get more pleasure out of the act.
Boring is boring, in or out of bed. It's just that being boring is considered "normal" in society, whereas being intense, creative, and volatile are traits of someone "unstable."
Alas.
S
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version