Fun Stuff > CHATTER

Facebook - it melts your brain

(1/3) > >>

KvP:
So says the professor of synaptic pharmacology at Oxford.

I guess you could say this is another volley in the battle over whether the rise of online socialising is benevolent or malevolent. I'm generally a proponent of the former notion, although I can certainly see how television could be detrimental to childhood development and I'm sure the same principles might apply to computer use.

JD:
Still better than Myspace.

Josefbugman:
Having your brain removed with hooks a'la an egyptian mummy is better than myspace.

Also I can't help but think that this is the old fashioned "back in my day" dressed up in academic language. I personally already had a shakey sense of self before I got into facebook, and have no intention of getting a shorter attention span from it. Also the idea that facebook can "sensationalise" anything is, to me at least, beyond laughable. I find facebooks stupidly dull and only use it as a place that is more convenient than my computer to store pictures, its dull, turgid and really really unsensational. Also, I find it slightly maddening that people are saying that an entire generation is going to be characterised by this bullcrap.

"I agree with this, not only these sites but the internet in general is producing a generation that has no emotional depth at all." says one of the comments, on the internet... Oh dear Gods why are these people allowed outside!

Rolling20s:

--- Quote from: Josefbugman on 24 Feb 2009, 15:58 ---"I agree with this, not only these sites but the internet in general is producing a generation that has no emotional depth at all." says one of the comments, on the internet... Oh dear Gods why are these people allowed outside!

--- End quote ---

Quite possibly, they never get outside, hence the problem. Facebook is okay for me, but I mainly use it in the way one might use Twitter; to update my status and see what people might have to say about it.

I like socializing online and do far more it using resources that are not Facebook. Come to think of it, why do I have a Facebook?

ruyi:
I am very skeptical of the article's claims. Greenfield basically makes a bunch of assertions without citing any studies, and its implied that we should believe/consider them simply because she's a neuroscientist.

Googling her was insightful. Apparently her specialty is brain physiology but she's well known in England for contributing to the public's understanding of science. That's legit and all, but it probably makes her prone to being self-aggrandizing, and this article seems to support that.

When I skim over the work she's published in academia, none of it has to do with the effects of contemporary technology on the brain, so I don't see how she has any support for what she's saying. She has published a book on the subject for the public, however, and it's received negative reviews on Amazon.

But on to the issues raised by the article.

First of all, I don't quite see the point of such extreme alarmism, besides finding an easy audience. All this doom and gloom and she doesn't even try to propose any solution!

And that's the thing: there isn't one. This transition to new ways of organizing/distributing information is inevitable and permanent, kinda like the transition to literacy years ago. There's going to be a trade-off, and it's going to be the new reality.


--- Quote ---If the young brain is exposed from the outset to a world of fast action and reaction, of instant new screen images flashing up with the press of a key, such rapid interchange might accustom the brain to operate over such timescales. Perhaps when in the real world such responses are not immediately forthcoming, we will see such behaviours and call them attention-deficit disorder.
--- End quote ---

That's the thing though - the internet is now part of the real world. It's not separate from the reality of human existence, nor will it become the totality of it. It's not going to cripple our ability to navigate the material world because we're not going to stop living in it.


--- Quote ---It might be helpful to investigate whether the near total submersion of our culture in screen technologies over the last decade might in some way be linked to the threefold increase over this period in prescriptions for methylphenidate, the drug prescribed for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.
--- End quote ---

Yeah, well, baseless speculating about this link without doing any studies might be helpful in building up hype for yourself.


--- Quote ---...the immediacy of an experience trumps any regard for the consequences. After all, whenever you play a computer game, you can always just play it again; everything you do is reversible. The emphasis is on the thrill of the moment, the buzz of rescuing the princess in the game. No care is given for the princess herself, for the content or for any long-term significance, because there is none. This type of activity, a disregard for consequence, can be compared with the thrill of compulsive gambling or compulsive eating...Unlike the game to rescue the princess, where the goal is to feel rewarded, the aim of reading a book is, after all, to find out more about the princess herself
--- End quote ---

Welp. This is a grossly inaccurate characterization of video games. In discounting their capability to tell stories with a higher degree of interactivity than ever before, she basically just reveals how little she knows about the subject. Also apparently nobody told her you are indeed allowed to reread books and rewatch films too  :?

Her whole thing on identity is also pretty dumb and not really worth discussing. Basically facebook will lead to ego-loss, so...social networking = psychedelics??

Finally, her conclusion:


--- Quote ---It is hard to see how living this way on a daily basis will not result in brains, or rather minds, different from those of previous generations.
--- End quote ---

'Change in life will result in changed minds.' And this is bad...why?


--- Quote ---We know that the human brain is exquisitely sensitive to the outside world.
--- End quote ---

Yes. But this points to the brain's remarkable ability to adapt rather than a delicate fragility.

My personal thoughts? I agree with something I've read somewhere I can't remember (man I've got such great authority) which is basically that: the internet is cool when it adds to our social interaction but it's harmful if it replaces it.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page