Fun Stuff > BAND
Band elimination polls...
Joseph:
So, are we actually going to do this then?
KharBevNor:
--- Quote from: De_El on 15 Mar 2009, 22:13 ---Eeeeeeeeeend Hiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiits
And, uh, 24 Hour Revenge Therapy. Seriously, step up the game, guys.
--- End quote ---
You have a disease. There is only one cure.
Single bullet to the base of the spine. That's the kindest way.
Joseph:
Couldn't you just lock him in a room with speakers which played nothing but Throbbing Gristle?
I can't decide which cure would be more punishing.
David_Dovey:
Guys we should definitely do this, with albums. Judging from the way it worked last time, everybody nominated bands, and then the bands with the most nominations made it into the actual vote-off, and they were arranged according to "seeding." This all seems like a pretty smart way of doing things.
I'd be glad to organise this deal if nobody else wants to. Should we (me?) start a new thread for nominations?
Perhaps everybody nominates their top five albums, with a maximum of one album per band. The top, say 64 albums could make it into the finals, with the "seeds" assigned to the top 32 based on votes received. Tie-breakers will be decided based on total number of votes the band received across all of their albums. The "seeded" albums will be matched randomly to "unseeded" albums for the first round of voting.
Should we allow more than one album per band? Could we arrange a way for people to upload the nominated albums into the mediafire thread or a seperate "album battle" thread? Is 64 albums way too many? Not enough?
How do people feel about this?
Inlander:
Definitely one album per band. Otherwise it'll just be "which band had the best albums", which is basically the same as "which band was the best band".
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version