Fun Stuff > ENJOY
Book to movie inconsistencies that are genuinely annoying and unneeded
BeoPuppy:
Dune. There are so many things in the first film that are just wrong. Frank Herbert spent pages and pages explaining how a planet without water might work ... and at the end of the film it starts to rain.
Yeah. Riight.
NeverQuiteGoth:
--- Quote from: BeoPuppy on 12 May 2009, 06:05 ---Dune. There are so many things in the first film that are just wrong. Frank Herbert spent pages and pages explaining how a planet without water might work ... and at the end of the film it starts to rain.
Yeah. Riight.
--- End quote ---
Moa'dib MADE it rain. He has SUPER POWERS.... :roll:
That first movie was still WAY better than the crappy scifi miniseries at least.
TheFuriousWombat:
--- Quote from: Catacombs on 11 May 2009, 14:22 ---The DaVinci Code.
Thread over.
--- End quote ---
If the book hadn't been absolute ungodly tripe, inconsistencies between the book and movie might be a bit more egregious.
Orbert:
What was that thing they did in the Lynch version of Dune, with the device that amplified your voice and could bust down walls and shit? What was that all about?
BeoPuppy:
That was Lynch's translation of 'the weirding way' mentioned in the book. It is supposed to be a self defence system deviced by the Bene Gesserit. But somehow it ended up being a weird box wich could amplify sound until ... strong ... and concentrated enough to .. shatter stone ... and stuff.
I don't know. It was a weird thing seeing that.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version