Fun Stuff > ENJOY
STAR TREK
KvP:
Star Trek and Star Wars have very different, metaphysically. Star Trek isn't "hard" sci-fi by any means (it's not Alien) but it likes science and things that sound like they're science. Star Wars is high fantasy with starships. Nothing that happens in Star Wars is really coincidental. It's all destiny and prophecy and shit.
UTAlan:
I loved this movie. I'll probably go back and see it in theaters at least once more!
--- Quote from: 0bsessions on 12 May 2009, 11:39 ---To be fair, in context, you know who ending up there makes sense with the explanation concerning his professor's dog.
--- End quote ---
Admiral Archer's dog, actually. That was one of my favorite parts, actually.
Kind of on that note, does anyone know off-hand in what year this is supposed to be taking place? I'm trying to figure out if it makes sense for it to have been the above mentioned Admiral's dog.
0bsessions:
--- Quote from: UTAlan on 13 May 2009, 14:20 ---Kind of on that note, does anyone know off-hand in what year this is supposed to be taking place? I'm trying to figure out if it makes sense for it to have been the above mentioned Admiral's dog.
--- End quote ---
According to the dude from Lost and Iron Man, the opening's stardate is "223304," with the bulk of the movie taking place twenty-five years later. According to Spock later in the movie, he's from the year 2387, and he's flung about 154 years into the past, pegging it around 2233.
ETA: Whoops. Anyways, I'm reasonably sure the parts I didn't shrink convey the answer without much spoilage.
Sox:
^ Spoiler.
Ozymandias:
So, in short, no, the reference makes no sense in continuity unless it is his grandson who also has a beagle.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version