Fun Stuff > ENJOY
Tim Burton's Alice in Wonderland
Sox:
Yep, you're right. Canoncity makes no difference to whether or not something is good or bad. It's a pretty crucial distinction to make for continuity though, which is something I think is important in a series or franchise. I understand why fans try to distinguish canon from non-canon because the canon is somewhat connected to the consistency of a franchise as a whole. Sure, you can judge each part seperately if it's an independent piece, but within a canon it's far more likely to be judged as part of a series, whether that's fair or not.
For the record, I don't think anybody has criticised the Guy Ritchie Sherlock Holmes because of it's non-canon status, but rather because it looks likely to be a terrible movie.
NeverQuiteGoth:
--- Quote from: TheFuriousWombat on 25 Jun 2009, 06:19 ---Any idea what this thing will be rated? I'm assuming PG-13 but I guess I keep thinking of American McGee's Alice and how violent that 'un was. I wouldn't really put it past Burton to go that route considering how gruesome Sweeney Todd was.
--- End quote ---
That's what I'm hoping for.
est:
My main complaint was that the title should be changed. It's not the same story, it is entirely different. It should have a different name to reflect that.
est:
and fuck yeah, most of the Star Wars UE stuff is about a brazilian times better than the original movies.
Cartilage Head:
The trailer is out.
It looks pretty stupid.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version