Comic Discussion > QUESTIONABLE CONTENT
WCT: October 19-23, 2009
hanalways:
When my brother got married. Haha. Typo. That's what happens when you multitask. >_> Not incestuous.
the_shankmaster:
Well, it was a different way to interpret a "little family wedding." :-P
ChokingOutTheRadio:
I don't have any protest against gay marriage, but this comic has jumped the shark. Ooooh lets get a reaction but pushing a hot button item. Boring. The auxilliary Hannelore is the only interesting character, and I like the addition of self concious Marigold. The rest of the characters have gotten stale, especially Marten and Dora (not that Dora ever was very interesting). And does every male in the strip have to look like carbon copies of each other? OOh Martens dad has white hair, that denotes he's older! He looks like a twenty-something with bleached hair to me. Sven, Angus and whoever that other forgettable male character thats dating the blonde forgettable character could all pop up in the strip and i wouldn't know which is which other than the fact Sven would make a sex joke. Faye is the only dynamic character yet she only pops up in the strip to crack a wise ass joke, despite having tons of history from which to pull material. Anyway, I typically read this comic once or twice a week and catch up on the strips I missed, but I'm pretty sure its just habit. Put this thing down already.
JD:
He's not pushing a hot button item, the fact that Marten's dad was gay was known for quite a while. He was even used in a joke if I remember correctly.
BigSol81:
The vast majority of devout religious people are sheep. Plain and simple. Blind devotion and blind faith to a being they have absolutely no evidence exists.
And no, the world being here is not "proof".
You're free to believe whatever you want, but I base my beliefs on evidence. I believe that the existence of a divine power is possible because I have no evidence that one does not exist, and no evidence exists to rule out such a being.
- There is no proof of a lack of God, thus no intelligent, rational human being can legitimately state that there is not one with any degree of certainty.
- There is no proof that God exists, thus no intelligent, rational human being can legitimately state that there is one with any degree of certainty.
I have just as much a problem with atheists as I do with theists, since just like theists, atheists claim knowledge without any empirical evidence. I am an agnostic, because I don't know what powers lie beyond. I don't know what happens after death, and if you think you do, if you think you're totally sure that you know, I can guarantee you're wrong.
If my opinions offend those of you that steadfastly deny the existence of any supreme beings, or those of you that cling pathetically to the idea of some magical, mystical savior, then that's too bad. Getting offended by someone else's opinion is ridiculous.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version