Fun Stuff > BAND
Metacritic's Best Music of the Decade
KharBevNor:
Talking of scientific methods, last.fm have published their chart of the year, based on scrobbles. It is kind of interesting to compare to the other lists, though obviously it is just flawed in a different way:
http://www.last.fm/bestof/2009/chart/40
Nodaisho:
--- Quote from: AanAllein on 20 Dec 2009, 15:23 ---As far as I can tell, there's no legitimate attempt to classify the records as the "best" of the decade (though I could certainly be wrong on this point).
--- End quote ---
That's not the sense I'm getting from the title and the beginning of the article, just skimming over it quickly to double check. They say best, not best-reviewed. Could be just trying to get more attention with bolder headlines, but that doesn't excuse it.
tricia kidd:
any list where super furry animals beat animal collective has my approval.
KickThatBathProf:
--- Quote from: Nodaisho on 22 Dec 2009, 06:38 ---
--- Quote from: AanAllein on 20 Dec 2009, 15:23 ---As far as I can tell, there's no legitimate attempt to classify the records as the "best" of the decade (though I could certainly be wrong on this point).
--- End quote ---
That's not the sense I'm getting from the title and the beginning of the article, just skimming over it quickly to double check. They say best, not best-reviewed. Could be just trying to get more attention with bolder headlines, but that doesn't excuse it.
--- End quote ---
It's kind of implied, seeing as the list is coming from Metacritic
Nodaisho:
I guess, but it still seems like they ought to qualify it.
Of course, most people looking for that sort of thing will be googling, and they wouldn't be googling for best reviewed music of the decade, although it would still probably end up coming pretty high on google search, from my experience.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version