Comic Discussion > QUESTIONABLE CONTENT

WCT Jan 4 to Jan 8 2010

<< < (14/31) > >>

Kugai:
The more disturbing part of that is Pintsize's comment.


Hmmmm


Maybe not, this is Pintsize we're talking about here.

ink slinger:

--- Quote from: Kugai on 05 Jan 2010, 10:54 ---The more disturbing part of that is Pintsize's comment.


Hmmmm


Maybe not, this is Pintsize we're talking about here.

--- End quote ---
Disturbing? Maybe.
Surprising? Absolutely not.

NeverQuiteGoth:

--- Quote from: JackFaerie on 05 Jan 2010, 10:41 --- As opposed to what FWB usually entails, specifically: "a sexual relationship based on each party desiring sexual gratification but without commitment, exclusivity, or any responsibility, and at least one party strongly resenting any hint of attachment or being possibly asked to consider or be responsible for the other party's needs outside of bed."
--- End quote ---
Sounds like a piss poor friend.
IMO the problem is when people say FWB they don't really mean the "F" part. I do.

BillyxRansom:

--- Quote from: Kugai on 05 Jan 2010, 10:54 ---The more disturbing part of that is Pintsize's comment.


Hmmmm


Maybe not, this is Pintsize we're talking about here.

--- End quote ---
Funniest line in a while.

westrim:
Aw man. I  want a social protocol database! Just why did that waitress tap her toe by my table when I paid for my meal?  :?

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version