Fun Stuff > BAND
Consistent catalogues
David_Dovey:
Honestly the only things on that Metacritic list that make me particularly annoyed is all the legacy act stuff & the compilations & live albums.
Thrillho:
You see, these are all about what we 'consider.'
If the banner on the CD says the artist name, then I'd say that means it's part of the official discography unless otherwise stated, regardless of how I personally feel about it.
Nodaisho:
What if the band didn't want it to be considered part of the discography, but the name got stuck on it anyway? I'm thinking the Sabbath albums when it was more Tony Iommi And Friends, and he just wanted to do his own thing with a solo project? Sure, you've got Never Say Die and Technical Ecstasy stuck between eight great studio albums, so they wouldn't quite count for consistency, but after Mob Rules I'm pretty sure everyone except the label knew that Sabbath was done making new material.
Inlander:
I want the time when I needlessly insulted a bus driver on a school trip to not be considered a part of my personal history but hey guess what guys, it happened.
Ptommydski:
Squeeze is a Velvet Underground record! Says so on the cover, right there. Self Portrait is a Bob Dylan record too. Their Satanic Majesties Request is an album by The Rolling Stones.
If you put a run of great records together, I don't think it detracts by having a few border albums in there which are rubbish.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version