Comic Discussion > QUESTIONABLE CONTENT
WCDT: 1-5 November 2010 (1786-1790)
pwhodges:
--- Quote from: raven_squadron542 on 01 Nov 2010, 11:05 ---Does anyone else find it odd that the bushes are INSIDE the window in the the first panel?
--- End quote ---
The plant's been inside since Dora got it; it's called Melvin.
Carl-E:
--- Quote from: raoullefere on 01 Nov 2010, 09:56 ---Anyway, I'm now trying to work out whether or not Tergon has caused me to cease to exist. For the record, I don't think he h *pop*
--- End quote ---
Wait - oh, dammi *pop*
In all honesty, even if I did run across a fanfic of something I was a fan of, I'd probably actively avoid it.
Anybody for Flo/Gecko?
pendrake:
For comic #1786...
1. Happy All Saints' Day, all. Hope everyone's Halloween was good too.
2. Funny comic, but makes my inner Hogwarts fan cry :psyduck: .
3. I also thought Marigold's device was a Nintendo product, with the Legend of Zelda's Tri-Force on its lid. Unless Nintendo also makes net-books?
4. Funny how Tai and Marigold are both so warmly dressed compared to Faye.
5. I sense more Tai "yuri" hijinks, this time directed towards Marigold :roll: .
AnAverageWriter:
--- Quote from: pendrake on 01 Nov 2010, 13:43 ---3. I also thought Marigold's device was a Nintendo product, with the Legend of Zelda's Tri-Force on its lid. Unless Nintendo also makes net-books?
--- End quote ---
Nah, the Triforce DS has the logo in the corner, like this-
http://www.amazon.com/Legend-Zelda-Gold-Triforce-DS-Nintendo/dp/B0022V26QG
Marigold has got to be holding a Villiv N5 or an MBook with a Zelda skin/decal. It's too round to be a Fujitsu, and too small to be an Acer.
Near Lurker:
--- Quote from: Dliessmgg on 01 Nov 2010, 10:10 ---
--- Quote from: Schmorgluck on 01 Nov 2010, 08:14 ---
--- Quote from: Border Reiver on 01 Nov 2010, 05:22 ---I'm just waiting for the Beowulf/Grendel slash fic
--- End quote ---
Or Gilgamesh/Enkidu slash fic.
Oh, wait...
--- End quote ---
I thought that was just yaoi bait, so the fangirls could think their part?
--- End quote ---
It's debatable due to translation issues, although usually with archaeological linguistics it's best to err on the side of what would squick a monk.
What's weird is that I've heard that most of the data we have on the legend other than the epic suggests earlier versions didn't put nearly so much emphasis on the relationship of the two. In composing our version, the poets and scribes so tasked followed the framework of the existing legends, but fleshed out (so to speak) the bond between the two men and moved it to the forefront of their account.
Sound familiar?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version