Comic Discussion > QUESTIONABLE CONTENT
WCDT 15-19 November 2010 (1796-1800)
Coco:
--- Quote from: Murphoid on 16 Nov 2010, 09:40 ---Hey! No Machiavellian thread jacking! :-D LOL.
--- End quote ---
And it would have worked if not for you meddling kids!
--- Quote from: Josefbugman on 16 Nov 2010, 09:31 ---Yeahhhh, you do realise that the interpretation of "The prince" as satire is a really recent invention? Considering that there had already been a book published in England, refuting Mach's points before "The prince" had even been translated, you sort of understand why people might not see it as satire.
--- End quote ---
Heh, well I was just having some fun feeling sympathy for authors in the internet age. Maybe I'll refer to Shakespeare's fart jokes in the future.
In any event, I may have to block myself from this site or I'll never get any work done ever again.
Sylette:
--- Quote ---Wow.
Just.. wow.
The sheer arrogance implicit in your post is awe inspiring.
I though I was king shit of self-absorbed mountain, but you, just.. wow.
I bow to you.
--- End quote ---
I know I'm arrogant. But I'm just trying to be honest, really :3
@eyosgkxb-- I know it would make crazy drama...I just like to dream. Sigh.
AnAverageWriter:
--- Quote from: Sylette on 16 Nov 2010, 10:13 ---I know I'm arrogant. But I'm just trying to be honest, really :3
--- End quote ---
Honest about what?
Your very first (and so far, the only) on topic post here consisted of a baffling assumption that somehow, the problems occurring between Dora and Marten have something to do with... Marten being "inhibited" in some way?
What the hell?
How in the world did you COME to that conclusion?
What, in fact, does "inhibition" have to do with anything here?
eyosgkxb:
--- Quote from: Sylette on 16 Nov 2010, 10:13 ---
--- Quote ---Wow.
Just.. wow.
The sheer arrogance implicit in your post is awe inspiring.
I though I was king shit of self-absorbed mountain, but you, just.. wow.
I bow to you.
--- End quote ---
I know I'm arrogant. But I'm just trying to be honest, really :3
@eyosgkxb-- I know it would make crazy drama...I just like to dream. Sigh.
--- End quote ---
I think what the other poster was getting at was your arrogance has no effect on the discussion of the current strip, it seemed very self absorbed to apply anything that had happened to you as an explanation/justification for anything that may happen in any strip.
I'm a Hanners/Anyone fan myself, I'd like to see her grow into more than comic relief.
Prince of Space:
--- Quote from: eyosgkxb on 16 Nov 2010, 09:43 ---Blame does nothing useful? Aside from keep the dispute on point? This is a dispute isn't it? I see 2 people with hurt feelings by what cause? So the cause here isn't one of the parties involved is what you are saying?
I hate to sound like a "Troll" as you put it, but please clarify what you even meant in that post?
Well, at the end of the day, Marten is right in this situation.
--- End quote ---
Blame is a tool used to make the blame-er like he or she is in the right. It's just not something to use in a level headed discussion or a relationship dispute.
For instance: Let's say I looked at your diary and found out you were screwing my boyfriend. I break up with said boyfriend. Then I blame you. We get into an argument. You blame me for reading your diary in the first place or for being neglectful of my boyfriend. I blame you for betraying me. Can you tell me how blame would make this go any better? It certainly wouldn't keep us 'on point'. We'd both have different viewpoints (our own) and would probably be unable to empathize with the other.
The only thing that would really matter is that it happened. Now how are you going to deal with it?
If two people want to make a relationship work, you talk things out. You try and find out why someone did something. Blaming someone else isn't going to change the fact that it happened. Knowing the root of the problem is helpful(hint: the root of the problem isn't watching his porn), but not unless you're trying to figure out a solution.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version