Comic Discussion > QUESTIONABLE CONTENT

WCDT 15-19 November 2010 (1796-1800)

<< < (116/356) > >>

Kyrendis:
Is this thread really dissolving into arguements about arguements?  :psyduck:

Right, I'm done. Wake me up when the new strip releases.

iduguphergrave:

--- Quote from: jephjacques via twitter ---okay let's see if I can make ustream work again

Hmm nope still broken. No broadcast tonight, I guess.

--- End quote ---

...


He's doing this on purpose.

UStream* happens to break at the moment of the most drama when we're all on pins and needles? Right.

Oh well, it's nice to be surprised.


(for those of you unfamiliar, when Jeph draws the comic he broadcasts the drawing process on the internet live via a website called ustream.com. It's pretty cool)

hannahsaurusrex:

--- Quote from: rje on 16 Nov 2010, 18:36 ---
Yes this! I really wa--
OMG what if we get ... Flashbacks!! Adorable high school gothette Dora and college dissatisfaction-with-goth-life Dora! (wait did she go to college I don't remember) with cameo with Original Goth Raven~! And we see all her shitty relationships with the Alpha Goth Assholes.

DO EET JEPH
You know you wanna draw teenage Dora.


--- End quote ---
Ohmanohman!

Personally, I've been going through all the scenarios I could think of.

Including but not limited to:
Dating a murderer
Dating a rapist
Dating a child molester
Dating a married man who didn't tell her she was married
Getting left at the alter
Getting raped
Getting an abortion
Having a miscarriage
Owned by a pimp
Drugged into submission

Is it cold in here?:
Yes, Dora went to college. Her major is unknown.

Emperor Norton:

--- Quote from: Random832 on 16 Nov 2010, 18:27 ---
--- Quote from: Emperor Norton on 16 Nov 2010, 17:43 ---Just because I want to take that time to do something, specifically a leisure activity, and someone else doesn't, means nothing.
--- End quote ---

I never said it does. I'm saying your tone it sound like it's a lot more time than it is, and that maybe it _is_ a lot more time for people who keep refreshing the thread.

Also, there's a difference between saying everyone should read it [no-one's said that] and that people should NOT post repetitive arguments without reading what has gone before. The latter is a reasonable position whether you or I agree with it or not.

--- End quote ---

Ok, fair, I don't have a problem with what you said. I do have a problem with Wiredgeek basically saying "put down the remote and learn to read". Its condescending and presumptuous. I've only really had a problem with the wording of his reaction, and his attitude, I just misinterpreted what you meant about it.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version