Fun Stuff > CLIKC
Bioware's New Game: It's Mass Effect 3.
imagist42:
Yeah guys, I don't see how having multiplayer necessarily means they sacrifice quality in the rest of the game. Based on what I gather from credits and my general understanding of The Way Things Work, it's generally not the same people working on both parts. So it's not like someone's going to tell the story designers "fuck, we're running close to the deadline, you need to quit what you're doing and finish the multiplayer." Of course, the only company whose model I really understand is Blizzard, and they're the of the "wait till it's fucking finished the way we want it to be" mentality. That's how a supposed 1.5 year interval between WoW expansions turned into 2 years between WotLK and Cataclysm.
Also, disk space as a limitation is probably the dumbest argument at hand.
ackblom12:
--- Quote from: tHEfOOL on 14 Dec 2010, 00:34 ---
--- Quote from: Ozymandias on 13 Dec 2010, 22:35 ---Assassin's Creed: Brotherhood and it's fucking brilliant multiplayer alongside its wonderful single player would like you to understand that that's not always the case.
--- End quote ---
yup that's why even though i absolutley loved the first two games and played through them several times each. i am boycotting brotherhood thank you very much, that game didn't need some gimmickey multiplayer to detract from disk space thus making the part of the game that made it good shorter
--- End quote ---
The single player is around 20 hours, same as the single player in the first two games. Stop your bitchin or at least bitch about something valid.
Ozymandias:
Man, if Brotherhood's multi is a gimmick, the video game industry would be much better off with more gimmicks. Clever as all fuck off.
Tom:
It's at least 30 hrs if you take your time and do everything, I've played 70hrs of ACII.
Alex C:
Brotherhood is the business.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version