Topic: Daniel Craig and Harrison Ford in: Cowboys Vs. Aliens (Read 12952 times)

scarred · « **on:** 17 Nov 2010, 15:06 »

Ladies and gentlemen, the first must-see film of 2011.

Blyss · « **Reply #1 on:** 17 Nov 2010, 15:34 »

Sidenote: Did Daniel Craig stab that guy in the junk?

That's pretty much what I was thinking...

Avec · « **Reply #2 on:** 17 Nov 2010, 15:55 »

Could they come up with a worse title?

Inlander · « **Reply #3 on:** 17 Nov 2010, 16:46 »

Naw, I like the title. It's Cowboys vs. Aliens. You tell the people what you're going to give them and then you give it to them. The worst thing a film like this can do is get ideas above its station. As long as it's just ridiculous and flashy and doesn't try to be anything more than an hour and a half of fun everything's going to be fine!

KvP · « **Reply #4 on:** 17 Nov 2010, 16:50 »

It's high concept. It's essentially Snakes on a Plane for 2010.

StaedlerMars · « **Reply #5 on:** 17 Nov 2010, 16:57 »

I will see this movie.

Inlander · « **Reply #6 on:** 17 Nov 2010, 17:02 »

Quote from: KvP on 17 Nov 2010, 16:50

It's high concept. It's essentially Snakes on a Plane for 2010.

Only it's directed by Jon Favreau, who has a pretty good touch for keeping things light and entertaining.

Blue Kitty · « **Reply #7 on:** 17 Nov 2010, 17:10 »

Harrison Ford alone will make this entertaining. From the trailer it sort of looks like he's phoning it in.

Buttfranklin · « **Reply #8 on:** 17 Nov 2010, 18:17 »

I had my fill of aliens and Harrison Ford together w/ the Crystal Skull.

jimbunny · « **Reply #9 on:** 18 Nov 2010, 07:36 »

See, it's Cowboys and Aliens, not Cowboys Vs. Aliens. So, yeah. Actually a bad title.

the_pied_piper · « **Reply #10 on:** 18 Nov 2010, 07:53 »

Fuck. Yes.

Jimor · « **Reply #11 on:** 18 Nov 2010, 13:28 »

Quote from: jimbunny on 18 Nov 2010, 07:36

See, it's Cowboys and Aliens, not Cowboys Vs. Aliens. So, yeah. Actually a bad title.

Not if you realize that they're playing off of "Cowboys and Indians".

Inlander · « **Reply #12 on:** 18 Nov 2010, 18:08 »

Indiana Bond and the Temple of the Crystal Spaceship Royale.

Johnny C · « **Reply #13 on:** 18 Nov 2010, 19:41 »

Clear And Present Defiance

Jimor · « **Reply #14 on:** 19 Nov 2010, 03:32 »

The Invasion Meets The Frisco Kid

Lines · « **Reply #15 on:** 19 Nov 2010, 04:59 »

Munich Wars: Episode IV - A New Golden Compass

Dazed · « **Reply #16 on:** 19 Nov 2010, 05:31 »

Air Force Cake

Wasteroo · « **Reply #17 on:** 19 Nov 2010, 10:41 »

Lara Croft: the Tomb Fugitive

Ozymandias · « **Reply #18 on:** 19 Nov 2010, 11:57 »

Blade of Solace

the_pied_piper · « **Reply #19 on:** 19 Nov 2010, 13:07 »

Road to The Devil's Own Obsession: Patriot Games' Renaissance Heroes

scarred · « **Reply #20 on:** 19 Nov 2010, 14:52 »

Bad Cowboy: Port of Lieutenant Aliens

Jimmy the Squid · « **Reply #21 on:** 19 Nov 2010, 17:36 »

James Jones: Casino of Doom

David_Dovey · « **Reply #22 on:** 19 Nov 2010, 19:33 »

Quote from: Ptommydski on 18 Nov 2010, 17:43

James Bond and Indiana Jones Ultimate Team Up.

Tagline: "They are a team now."

Rose · « **Reply #23 on:** 20 Nov 2010, 15:37 »

Not a fan of Speilburg, hate Ron Howard (with a passion), over produced bullshit of gimmicky titles. Going to skip this one.

JD · « **Reply #24 on:** 20 Nov 2010, 17:14 »

I don't understand how you can dislike Spielberg's films.

Jimor · « **Reply #25 on:** 20 Nov 2010, 17:18 »

It's the only way to maintain Indie Cred.

Jimor · « **Reply #26 on:** 20 Nov 2010, 17:20 »

At the expense of Indy Cred, however.

Jimmy the Squid · « **Reply #27 on:** 20 Nov 2010, 17:33 »

Brilliant.

Radical AC · « **Reply #28 on:** 22 Nov 2010, 11:15 »

Aliens totally gave James Bond a Pip-Boy.

ummmkay · « **Reply #29 on:** 25 Nov 2010, 05:41 »

i will probably not see this movie, mostly based on how stupid the title is.

Thomas Edison · « **Reply #30 on:** 25 Nov 2010, 08:40 »

That's a terrible reason to not see a film.

David_Dovey · « **Reply #31 on:** 25 Nov 2010, 10:39 »

The Empire Strikes Back is a pretty dumb name for a film too, when you think about it.

The Beatles is a fucking horrendous name for a band. Puns? Who the fuck OK'd that piece of shit!?

Jimor · « **Reply #32 on:** 25 Nov 2010, 23:51 »

Quote from: ummmkay on 25 Nov 2010, 05:41

i will probably not see this movie, mostly based on how stupid the title is.

Man, how many people do I have to smack about this?

Kugai · « **Reply #33 on:** 26 Nov 2010, 10:15 »

And would you have not gone to see Die Hard?

David_Dovey · « **Reply #34 on:** 26 Nov 2010, 10:58 »

DO NOT REPEAT BACK TO ME WHAT I HAVE JUST SAID IN DIFFERENT FUCKIN' WORDS

ummmkay · « **Reply #35 on:** 28 Nov 2010, 18:40 »

okay, okay, i will add to my previous statement that i don't really like movies of that sort anyway and the fact that the title is idiotic just seals the deal for me. also i have never seen die hard. DON'T HATE ME

Jimor · « **Reply #36 on:** 28 Nov 2010, 20:43 »

Well, I'm not going to say you're not allowed to dislike the title, but the movie literally exists because of it, so in the marketing sense, it's the kind of pure genius that strikes once or twice a generation.

[Cowboys and Indians. Cowboys and Indians. Cowboys and Indians. Cowboys and Indians. Cowboys and Indians... Cowboys and Aliens? Cowboys and ALIENS!!! Holy Fuck! I just created a license to print money!]

And reading the Production History, that's exactly what the guy set out to do.

Kugai · « **Reply #37 on:** 28 Nov 2010, 21:13 »

"Good evening Dr. Jones"
"What's yer name boy?"
"Bond. James Bond."

ginandphonics · « **Reply #38 on:** 01 Dec 2010, 12:35 »

"Writers Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzmann say one of the biggest challenges was convincing Harrison Ford he could wear a hat that wouldn't immediately remind everyone of Indiana Jones."

Lies, damned lies.

TheFuriousWombat · « **Reply #39 on:** 01 Dec 2010, 12:48 »

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/30/movies/30cowboys.html

huh

tHEfOOL · « **Reply #40 on:** 01 Dec 2010, 15:11 »

Quote from: Radical AC on 22 Nov 2010, 11:15

Aliens totally gave James Bond a Pip-Boy.

a pip-boy with a LAZOR

scarred · « **Reply #41 on:** 02 Dec 2010, 14:19 »

Quote from: TheFuriousWombat on 01 Dec 2010, 12:48

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/30/movies/30cowboys.html

huh

first rule of serious filmmaking:

don't call your movie "Cowboys & Aliens"

tHEfOOL · « **Reply #42 on:** 02 Dec 2010, 15:25 »

second rule of film making: if you think there are enough lasers in you science fiction film, add more lasers

Kugai · « **Reply #43 on:** 02 Dec 2010, 16:39 »

Quote from: tHEfOOL on 02 Dec 2010, 15:25

second rule of film making: if you think there are enough lasers in you science fiction film, add more lasers

And you have Transformers 2

tHEfOOL · « **Reply #44 on:** 02 Dec 2010, 17:02 »

somewhere yes, and i think it still needs even more LAZOR

Scandanavian War Machine · « **Reply #45 on:** 02 Dec 2010, 17:23 »

transformers 2 does need more lasers.

it needs them outside, in the real world, pointed directly at every copy of that awful awful movie

THESE FORUMS NOW CLOSED (read only)

Author Topic: Daniel Craig and Harrison Ford in: Cowboys Vs. Aliens (Read 12952 times)