Comic Discussion > QUESTIONABLE CONTENT

Conduct in this forum

<< < (5/10) > >>

Emperor Norton:
Fair enough. Though I will say that... realistic is a thing I've seen some people be unable to understand... :P (Especially because of projection... something that seems realistic to me may not seem realistic to someone else. I get the overall idea, I'm just hoping that some people who may have a skewed view of realism getting in huge trouble for things that make sense to them.)

Like I said. Specificity in what you are talking about is more what I was wanting, not that i think you are doing anything wrong. Best to obey the laws of the land. And best to know what those laws actually are.

akronnick:
I've been following this thread from its beginning with my mouth shut and my ears open, and all I have to say is:

I for one welcome our new ban-hammer-wielding overlords.

Wiregeek:

--- Quote from: akronnick on 09 Dec 2010, 17:26 --- for one welcome our new ban-hammer-wielding overlords.
--- End quote ---

I am by god trying to come up with a way to argue against the 'enhanced moderator involvement' scheme, and I can't do it. Spent too damn long hollering for it. Oh well, I'm not that good at Devil's Advocate anyway.


--- Quote ---(frankly, I don't think it does)
--- End quote ---

It doesn't. He's not very good at it, and it's, well, kinda cute. If PWHodges stays out of the looney bin and in the moderation staff, hopefully we can keep a recurrence from occurring, whether the action is seen as abjuring or curing. The thing with a fling into what madness can bring, is that as loud as you sing, you might end up in a sling.

Dr. ROFLPWN:
As the dude who was responsible for the Even Worse Thread's genesis, I also want to offer my sincere apologies, like iduguphergrave, and my word as vow that I will leash myself to the boundaries of good taste as firmly as possible from now on.

I think that the new moderator/staff presence will doubtless improve the forum, and probably make it a place that, eventually, will not be associated with wearing the Bear Hat.

Skewbrow:
Nice to get the law laid down.

As a relative newbie I decided to take a peek at the oldest parts of this subforum. Say something like pages 19 and 20 and from that point on towards more current. They are dated around 2008, starting from around the time Faye and Sven attempted a relationship in QCverse. There are several locked/emptied threads there. At some points it even looked like the locked threads were more frequent than what we have experienced lately. Anyway, quickly perusing the locked threads tells unmistakably what is not acceptable.

So, for what it's worth, the newbies might be adviced to take a look, and see what not to do. Ideally we/they shouldn't need to, but in practice it might be a good thing also to see the law applied as opposed to only laid down.

I agree with what has been said many times. These recurring problems are caused by us newbies not realizing that this is a private sector of the interwebs, and not realizing that some things should be left to Pintsize. Hopefully things will improve in the future. I will do my best not to make things worse.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page