Fun Stuff > CHATTER
TOMMY!!
The Seldom Killer:
--- Quote from: allison on 15 Dec 2010, 20:20 ---Also if dudes judge Hollywood-perfect ladies like that
What the heck kinda chance do I have
--- End quote ---
There's a formula for that.
R=H-Y
where Y = (T x X)/(Q+N/2)
T is time a man has been single and is either 1 if the man has only been single for a fortnight or 100 where it's been longer
X is their own rating on a 1-10 scale by popular assessment.
Q is their perception of women in their area
N is the number of single women in the area
H is the Hollywood popular assessment of the ideal object of a man's affections (capped at 11)
R then is the lowest number on the 1-10 scale that a woman rates by popular assessment that a man will consider as a potential mate.
Conversely, a man's chances are determined by (BP/2)+1 where BP is the Hollywood popular assessment of a woman's favourite celebrity (nominal Brad Pitt).
KharBevNor:
C+, show your workings.
Alex C:
--- Quote from: Ptommydski on 16 Dec 2010, 04:18 ---.any girl who I actually like is going to be more attractive.
--- End quote ---
This. My healthiest relationship was with a woman who took care of herself but wasn't really a looker. She was a positive influence in my life on many levels and when I think of her now it's not even really the way she looked that comes to mind.
neomang5:
--- Quote from: Alex C on 15 Dec 2010, 15:41 ---For god's sake, they used to give Audrey Hepburn "plain girl" roles at one point.
--- End quote ---
Meh. She wasn't really that attractive and I don't get the hype around her as some gorgeous figure of womanly beauty. She was pretty okay looking and did well in Hollywood. The only reason I couldnt see her as a plain girl is the dignified air about her.
Alex C:
That's because she's more of a fashion icon than the bombshell type.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version