Fun Stuff > CHATTER
So,
Johnny C:
it slipped my mind too that discuss required a post count – so much so that i actually just spent fifteen minutes digging for the thread where we decided that and, uh, can't find it. nor can i find the actual post count requirement. this could have happened to me as much as it could have happened to paul.
David_Dovey:
Pretty sure it's 100 posts
--- Quote from: jhocking on 26 Dec 2010, 17:21 ---man tommy you took this way more seriously than I would expect.
--- End quote ---
+1 What's the big deal?
pwhodges:
100 is what I recall - but I can't find where it's written down either.
Demonic Angel:
--- Quote from: Ptommydski on 26 Dec 2010, 21:21 ---
--- Quote from: Inlander on 26 Dec 2010, 19:52 ---It's what everyone else does.
--- End quote ---
Not everyone.
--- End quote ---
Tommy, some of us are happier being sheep than the classy, more individualistic members like yourself.
Patrick:
--- Quote from: David_Dovey on 27 Dec 2010, 14:06 ---
--- Quote from: jhocking on 26 Dec 2010, 17:21 ---man tommy you took this way more seriously than I would expect.
--- End quote ---
+1 What's the big deal?
--- End quote ---
I'd imagine it's because he doesn't believe in judging new folks before knowing them, and that's an implied interpretation of the postcount rule. I don't think my conviction will be as strong as his over the matter, but now that we're trying to be more newbie-friendly than we've historically been I am having trouble seeing why that rule's in place.
I mean, hardly anything happens in there. Other than Paul's thread where he mentions the Wikileaks thread alterations, nobody's posted there since the 24th.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version