Comic Discussion > QUESTIONABLE CONTENT
WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Skelepunk:
If I were Marten, that's exactly where I'd go, too. When in doubt, nap.
As for Mrs.Reed, although it was tactless, I cannot help but love those types of statements that point out the obvious like that. That being said, it was a bad call on her part.
--- Quote from: LordVaughn on 03 Jan 2011, 00:39 ---Mojo, it's wrong because not only would she dating the brother of her son's ex, but probably might even send Dora over the edge, seeing how it would be not only someone she has admitted to masturbating to, having sex with Sven but the mother of her ex. There's a complicated rule somewhere, I know it.
--- End quote ---
I think the rule you are looking for is rudeness. I think it would be impolite for Marten's mom to sleep with her son's ex's brother.
akronnick:
--- Quote from: Mojo on 03 Jan 2011, 00:31 ---Ok, why would it be wrong, based on her age (the theory of relativity prevents her seducing him for other, more salient reasons)? I'm in my 40s now, and I'm constantly being hit on and flirted with by 20-30 year-olds. Of course, I don't date any of them, but why would it be wrong if I did (or Veronica did with Sven)?
--- End quote ---
It has absolutely nothing to do with age.
Certain persons who are related to certain other persons shall forever remain persona-non-nooki for the first person.
Otherwise it just gets wierd.
westrim:
I guess Sven hasn't changed after all; it looks like he's still into whores. :angel:
Akima:
I can't see Hanners' Mum being sexually kinky somehow. For her, I think, it's all about power. And wood-chippers...
The expression on Marten's Mum's face in panel three is brilliant. Art-kudos to Jeph. Also, the magazine Sven is reading...
Blackjoker:
I fear the day that Martens dam bursts, when it does..the horror, the horror.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version