Fun Stuff > CLIKC
e-readers are amazing!
Papersatan:
I have spent countless hours debating the value of a physical book versus a digital copy of the text. I have a literature degree and I took a number of classes which dealt with publishing practices, the history of print, the rise of digital and other relatedly things. I have read essays on the topic, attended guest lectures, listened to other students argue in classrooms and watched executives for publishers and digital companies argue with experts on literature and typography. And I have found that the argument against e-readers are mostly people stretching to find things that are wrong with them because they like the way books smell.
I don't think there is anything wrong with liking the way a book smells or any other aspect of its physical form, and there are things that physical books do better than digital copies, but there are also things digital copies do better and there is room in the market for both. Digital copies are not a replacement for leather bound collector's editions of your favorite book. They are a replacement for paperbacks. I have paperbacks which my father read in college and the majority of them are already worn and brittle so arguments about lifespan are really moot. They were not made to last, they were made to be inexpensive and portable.
My biggest problem with arguments for books as objects is that it seems to accept as fact the idea that when I buy a book I am buying an object and not ideas. This was not always so, it was successfully argued by publishers 200 years ago, and led to our current intellectual property laws, but I don't accept it as fact. When I buy a book I am buying it for the intangible ideas it contains. Arguments which centered on there being nothing there, or the experience of reading being diminished without a physical book trouble me because they seem to buy into this. It ideas and the words that form them which make us fall in love with a book, and those words and ideas still exist on an e-reader.
The rise of digital technology may scare those who love physical books, but it needn't, for one thing I think that it will do good things for the future of physical books. Print on demand technologies mean that a book need never go "out of print" enabling you to find a copy when you want one. I think that as more people get e-readers the market for nice physical copies will actually increase, and the offerings for this segment will also increase.
The cherished memories of passing a book from one generation to the next may slip away, but as I said I think nice editions of books will still exist. If passing a physical book along does stop, well that tradition had a start, people still loved each other, and shared their knowledge and experiences before there were printed books, and they will continue to do so after.
As far as obsolescence, that is a real challenge for digital formats, but it is one that people are tackling. People back up their copies, as linked above there are format converters and "the cloud" means that even if I lose *my* copy a copy will still exist and I will be able to find it.
I don't think that we are casting books aside for digital copies simply for the sake of "modernity," e-readers do a lot of things better. They make a text inexpensive, portable, searchable and allow me to look up new words as I read. These are things that print can't compete with, and so like manuscripts gave way to print, print is giving way to digital.
jhocking:
--- Quote from: ackblom12 on 28 Jan 2011, 10:43 ---It really is hard to explain why e-readers are amazing unless you've used one
--- End quote ---
On a related note, it is really hard to convey to people just how awesome e-ink screens are. Unlike most computer screens that shoot out light, e-ink screens actually rearrange grains of pigment in the screen. awesome
Or how e-ink screens don't need power to maintain their appearance. When I opened my sister-in-law's Kindle, the instructions on the screen weren't a sticker attached over the screen, it was literally the screen. E-ink screens don't need power to maintain their appearance, so at the factory they just display the instructions and then ship it like that.
nekowafer:
It's apparently very difficult for people to understand this. I'm on a Nook discussion board thingy and there are always questions of "where's the backlight?"
jhocking:
--- Quote from: ackblom12 on 29 Jan 2011, 10:24 ---Between the e-books, I love our kindle, but I was quite disappointed by Amazon's insistence on propitiatory file format.
--- End quote ---
They eventually wised up:
http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/news/2009/11/kindle-2-finally-gets-native-pdf-support-screen-rotation.ars
Until just now though I didn't realize the original Kindle didn't support PDF, that is fucked up.
--- Quote from: Papersatan on 30 Jan 2011, 08:45 ---It ideas and the words that form them which make us fall in love with a book, and those words and ideas still exist on an e-reader.
--- End quote ---
Silly! The value of books isn't the ideas and words within, its how good they look lined up on the bookshelf in your den. Nothing classes up a place quite like a bunch of musty old books.
ackblom12:
Oh that is good news. We have the DX and despite it having PDF support, it's pretty dogshit at the moment. The update sounds like that should improve quite a bit though.
It still unfortunately leaves Amazon as one of the only e-readers not using an open source format though. Obviously not a real problem since I got directed to the file format converter but still irritating.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version