Comic Discussion > QUESTIONABLE CONTENT

WCDT 14-18 February 2011 (1861-1865)

<< < (56/81) > >>

pwhodges:
OK, you did say "if".  Anyway, that line will die quick enough as new information emerges.

TheEvilDog:
A little off topic, and a little off kilter, but whats funny for me is that we use the abbreviation tSB, which always reminds me of these guys who used to be known as TSB.

someone1074:

--- Quote from: pwhodges on 17 Feb 2011, 08:12 ---I really do think this is being taken too far, being based on nothing more than Marten's original comment about the atmosphere when he first went to tSB.

--- End quote ---

You see nothing in the character designs? At all? I mean that might just have been done for fun, but I think that's definitely fueling some of the comparisons too.

pwhodges:
You can always find some individual similarities; that doesn't mean they add up to anything.

(FWIW, I work in clinical trials, so I have quite some awareness of the ease with which wrong conclusions can be conjured out of patterns in dust.)

Mr. Doctor:

--- Quote from: snubnose on 17 Feb 2011, 05:18 ---Its not good if you immediately jump into the next relationship after the last one failed. You need some time to think things through. Especially find out why the previous relationship failed. So you might not repeat the same errors the next time.

Otherwise Dora will turn into just another "They're all crazy".

And about time ... I dunno, maybe a week or two ? Not more than three.

--- End quote ---

yeah yeah I agree, but it's common sense so.. meh. The thing is that we DO NOT know how the timeline goes in QC. Come on... From one comic to another we got SNOW and Dora with pretty long blonde hair, that doesn't happen within "a week or two". This could have easily been a month after the breakup at least.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version