Comic Discussion > QUESTIONABLE CONTENT
WCDT 4-8 April 2011 (1896-1900)
iduguphergrave:
--- Quote from: Carl-E on 07 Apr 2011, 04:48 ---Looks like Clinton (RaD to you, Raoul) is right handed after all.
I think what he finds "fascinating" is the near-human-companioonship level of the argument. They're like a pair of siblings, or an old not-so-happily married couple.
--- End quote ---
I agree; he doesn't really look squicked out; more surprised than anything. He's probably thinking something along the lines of "Wow I did not expect this!"
I hope we find out more about Marten and Pintsize's history. I always assumed he brought him over from California with him, but now that I double-check, Marten said he had a suitcase full of clothes and not much else and doesn't mention Pintsize. Plus if he got Pintsize for companionship, it makes more sense that he got him after he broke up with Vicky (the chick he moved out there for).
Is it cold in here?:
Marten bought the M-31 chassis when trying to save Pintsize from self-destructive behavior, and got in trouble with the RDA as a result.
We could use "buying the chassis" to mean getting hurt yourself while trying to bail out someone else.
Ascension:
--- Quote from: Kugai on 07 Apr 2011, 12:56 ---The truth is out - They're all the ancestors of the crew of the original Enterprise. :-D
--- End quote ---
I could definitely see Steve as Kirk's ancestor. But I don't really think Clinton's response here should count as a Trek reference. It's in bold and he has an openly shocked facial expression. =/= Spock.
LoveJaneAusten:
I think it's interesting that Marten only seems to assert himself over Pintsize, who isn't human. In almost all other cases, he's pretty spineless.
Method of Madness:
--- Quote from: cesariojpn on 07 Apr 2011, 12:57 ---
--- Quote from: Method of Madness on 07 Apr 2011, 10:20 ---
--- Quote from: cesariojpn on 07 Apr 2011, 01:46 ---
--- Quote from: Method of Madness on 07 Apr 2011, 00:18 ---That doesn't make any sense.
Do you know who else didn't make sense?
--- End quote ---
You mean "Do you know what else doesn't make sense?", right?
--- End quote ---
No, I don't. Why would you think that?
--- End quote ---
I nitpick, thats why.
--- End quote ---
No, I mean, I don't get what you were going for. The answer to my question was a person who is no longer alive, that's why "who" and that's why "didn't". So I'm just confused is all :psyduck:
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version