Comic Discussion > QUESTIONABLE CONTENT

WCDT 11-15 April 2011 (1901-1905)

<< < (35/69) > >>

Shteevie:


Okay, guys. This is your opportunity. Go nuts!

raoullefere:

--- Quote from: Blyss on 13 Apr 2011, 08:19 ---I think that Clinton gets the misused version of the word 'creepy' - but, then again, it probably is a little creepy to have someone go all fanboy about one of your parents.

I still consider him harmless, but maybe Hanners just inadvertently started the android/robot revolution, and they will begin assimilating our planet now...

You just never can tell.
 :psyduck:


--- End quote ---
I don't see Clinton as creepy so much as I feel he is a crazed weirdo. Yes, there is a difference, I think. Creepy implies, to me, stalking or some other sort of inappropriate sexual connotation paired with personal infringement, whereas crazed weirdo simply means he's stuck on one particular subject, thinks far too much about it, and his brain gets overheated whenever it comes up but there's noting remotely personal about it. Clinton could probably care less about Hanners as a person or a female, I suspect—but as a cult of the EC object, she's 'worthy' of his maniac attention. He's pretty clearly gone off the deep end in his subject area. I know some poeple who are like this about various things—cars, bands, Walt Whitman. (I kid you not; one person I know was a fearful Whitman scholar/fanatic, in that we were all afraid of him. You did not want to get him on the subject, and god help us all if some relative of Whitman's had ever made his/her connection known is his presence.)

Kazukagii, I think you've already won the "how hard"* contest via your sheer willingness to go into that place where all who are decent should not: Punland, the country next to that festering hellhole known as Coupleportmanteausia. I give you half of one of my internets, the other half being reserved because, of course, you went to Punland, you evil wretch. Shame on you.

*If anyone begins reading the thread at this point and wonders what we're talking about, rest assured it's not only what you think, but far, far worse. Save yourself!

John_Knee:

--- Quote from: Skewbrow on 13 Apr 2011, 05:19 ---@Carl-E: The car nerd example is illuminating. Hopefully I will get this eventually.

Yes. Clinton crossed the boundary of Hannelore's personal space in many ways.


--- End quote ---

I don't think Clinton was creepy as people seem to think or a variation of. His reaction towards Hanners when he found out who she was was no worse than the reaction of a 12 year old girl who has won a competition to meet Justin Bleber or whatever his name is. The difference is that Hanners is oversensitive to contact and space due to her OCD. There is no reason why Clinton or anyone else who hasn't met her before to assume that and his reaction would have been alkward to most people with a more normal set of personal characteristics at worse - or simple amusement.

And why is everyone assuming Martin needed to use the sword on him. I imagine that Clinton got the hint, probably apologised to Hanners and left without Martin needing to take any further action.

Method of Madness:
He didn't need to use the sword on him, but if he did, they were saying how he would've done it most effectively.

Oddly enough, typing that made me think of a few years ago when OJ wanted to release his book, that was basically "I didn't kill my wife, but if I had killed my wife, I would've done it like this."

Is it cold in here?:
Those _were_ kind of personal questions, and he was standing within her Inner Defense Zone while he asked them.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page