Comic Discussion > QUESTIONABLE CONTENT

WCDT 11-15 April 2011 (1901-1905)

<< < (12/69) > >>

J:

--- Quote from: Antario on 12 Apr 2011, 01:13 ---aw i was just beginning to like this storyline, finally some details on hannersdad....and then jeph seems to be cutting it off....with a broadsword



--- End quote ---

you really think a hardcore transhumanist like clinton is about to be caught defenseless?

shit is about to get epic.

nonethousand:
hi everybody!

"long-time lurker, first-time writer,... bla bla bla" ...so much for my introduction :evil:

just wanted to point out that John Elliot-Chatham is probably the QC-verse analog of William Bell (Fringe-verse)... isn't he? :psyduck:

PS: wow! my first post and my first psyduck too!! :laugh: :laugh:

akronnick:

--- Quote from: Tergon on 12 Apr 2011, 01:01 ---I think creating a robot that realistically behaved like a hamster would actually be a challenge!  I mean, programming a computer to think like a human is complicated, but the behavioural patterns of human beings is well-understood and well-studied.  Programming a robot hamster would be at least as difficult, but you'd have to know how a hamster's brain works as intricately as a human brain.  So that's impressive!

--- End quote ---

It would be, if the internal processes where being emulated, but, as I understand the actual implimentation, they just simulate the behavior, so the wee beastie divides its time prtty much equally between running on a wheel, chewing on a stick, sipping the water bottle, sleeping in one corner of its cage and shitting in the other.

It just repeats those actions at random until the battery dies.

The bad part about them is your kid always makes you replace the battery. At least with a real hamster you can bury it in a shoebox in the flower bed when it dies.

LeeC:
Marten to the rescue!

Odal:
I thiought Clinton had a metal arm.  It's just a hand though :(

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version