Comic Discussion > QUESTIONABLE CONTENT
WCDT: Independence Day Week (4 - 8 July, 1961-1965)
pwhodges:
--- Quote from: westrim on 07 Jul 2011, 03:04 ---somewhat random death and great floods (okay, bans and thread locks)
--- End quote ---
Not many threads get locked, and the reason is usually quite clear. Often it's trivial, like avoiding a duplicated discussion (if it's still possible, I prefer to merge threads when this happens, but sometimes the result would be unreadable).
--- Quote ---that picture thread he made was not worksafe and he was c/rude to anyone that posted in it, including editing their comments
--- End quote ---
Yeah, I hated it when he did that.
--- Quote ---But I'm repeating a lot of what was said on the conduct thread (wish I had read it before, it was interesting)
--- End quote ---
That's what it's for... And he posted here only a few weeks ago, when he banned a user - the only ban of a normal contributor since before the breakup last autumn.
westrim:
--- Quote from: Tiogyr on 07 Jul 2011, 03:17 ---He's showed up once since then to ban someone for making posts very similar to what you're making here, so yeah, you may want to drop it.
--- End quote ---
I was finishing with that last post, so I kind of already dropped it. Do you have linkage to this event? And similar in what way?
EDIT: Apparently it happened a few weeks ago, but might I get pointed to the right thread?
--- Quote from: TheEvilDog on 07 Jul 2011, 03:19 ---Or see it from the perspective that these characters are Jeph's creation, and with that comes a disgust when someone makes a comment along the lines of "Hanners and Marigold come out as lesbians and have been since they met."
--- End quote ---
Shoot, I'm trying to drop this people. But I feel I must say that considering the number of romantic relationships in this comic and the unforeseeability of some of them (say, Faye and Sven), people are naturally going to be looking for or inventing their own wacky pairing, trying to predict what's next. There have been many polls to that effect. That there are some pairings he dislikes and some of the supporters of those pairings get exuberant is not by the general tone of this forum enough grounds for banning them or deleting their posts, both of which I have seen, though not recently. Especially since one of those pairings did have a "opposites attract" vibe that made it appealing to some despite it's crackiness. They're his creation, its our interpretation.
VonKleist:
Where´s my comiiiiiic?
Gah.. I´m hooked through the bag :|
WAYF:
--- Quote from: westrim on 07 Jul 2011, 03:04 --- the last two times I saw contact from them on this board
--- End quote ---
Ah, now, correct me if I'm wrong, but last November would have contained the week of the breakup, wouldn't it?
I don't think Jeph's actions were entirely unrelated to that...
pwhodges:
--- Quote from: westrim on 07 Jul 2011, 03:25 ---can I least get pointed to the right thread?
--- End quote ---
Here. And Tiogyr's analysis of the reason is not quite right; the poster was being rude and personal. As it happens, Jeph appeared (as far as I can tell) in response to a post being reported; coincidentally, the mods were discussing a ban, but it happened before they got there!
--- Quote from: VonKleist on 07 Jul 2011, 03:27 ---Where´s my comiiiiiic?
--- End quote ---
He's on the last frame (after 3 1/2 hours); all new fiddly backgrounds, lots of perspective to work out, varied poses. The text will be the thing in this one - I can't tell from the pictures what it will contain (or maybe I can, actually).
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version