Comic Discussion > QUESTIONABLE CONTENT

WCDT: 25-29 July 2011 (1976-1980)

<< < (7/40) > >>

Carl-E:

--- Quote from: Kugai on 24 Jul 2011, 22:20 ---And to start the week DICKS!!!

--- End quote ---

Technically, no.  They only look that way. 

Some of them. 



God, I hope  there aren't any real ones in there...

pwhodges:
Just to mess with your minds, here's Jeph's last tweet of a sketch from the con: QC YAOI.

DSL:

--- Quote from: Torlek on 25 Jul 2011, 06:26 ---
--- Quote from: DSL on 25 Jul 2011, 04:29 ---Or consider them Star Trek novels (characterization and backstory all over the map) instead of Star Wars novels (under such tight approval by Lucas that, if you see it between book covers, it's canon)?

--- End quote ---
Less apt comparison than most think. Two of the Voyager books were actually considered canon at the time though their status now is questionable. Additionally, since Roddenberry died there's been no singular arbiter of canonicity for Trek. [/randomnerdtangent]

--- End quote ---


Oh, even when Roddenbugger was alive and kicking, the backstory was all over the place.

Carl-E:
Gene Retconberry. 

SirDudley:
*raises hand*

Why is Hanners wearing the Worry Hat? That's the only thing that stood out as weird today.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version