Comic Discussion > QUESTIONABLE CONTENT
WCDT 15-19 August 2011 (1991-95)
Mr. Doctor:
Heh, it's obvious that some people don't read the comics too carefully and make up their own stories.
Hanners clearly doesn't live off her parents' money. She has two jobs. Just because we're not seeing her doing the counting business in the comics doesn't mean she's not working on that anymore.
Emperor Norton:
I like how the forums response to a cute joke scene in a webcomic is to be appalled at the behavior of one or more characters.
I'm serious, has there been a time in the entire comic where someone wasn't bitching about SOMETHING another character did?
Emperor Norton:
--- Quote from: tender on 17 Aug 2011, 14:46 ---
--- Quote from: Emperor Norton on 17 Aug 2011, 14:38 ---I like how a few people's responses...
--- End quote ---
--- End quote ---
Sorry the, generalisation was unintended. I meant it more in the "Why is everything a moral quandary here to some people?".
Its like, we can't just enjoy a funny joke to some of the people here. I just, don't see why this has to be serious business. I wasn't referring to people who are obviously not taking it as serious business, just the fact that, at all times a significant portion of conversation on these threads is about how X is wrong or Y is a bitch etc etc.
For once I was expecting to come in and people just commenting on how amusing this whole interaction was. I was somewhat annoyed that it was once again a debate on how half the characters are being mean or wrong.
If it sounded like I was taking it out on the people uninvolved in doing this, I apologise, that was not the intention.
iduguphergrave:
Are you sure you have over a hundred posts? Because you sound like you're MUCH newer to this forum than that. :psyduck:
Tova:
We just have a couple of truly absorbed followers, that's all.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version