Comic Discussion > QUESTIONABLE CONTENT

WCDT 22-26 August 2011 (1996-2000)

<< < (32/99) > >>

gangler:
The narrative require sound now? I think you might be confusing it with narration.

TheBiscuit:

--- Quote from: gangler on 23 Aug 2011, 19:22 ---The narrative require sound now? I think you might be confusing it with narration.

--- End quote ---
While I agree with you, he also does have a point that the concept of "narrative" is largely foreign to 2001.

gangler:
Is it? That surprises me. The concept is pretty all inclusive. Does it not tell a story at all?

Method of Madness:

--- Quote from: gangler on 23 Aug 2011, 19:22 ---The narrative require sound now? I think you might be confusing it with narration.

--- End quote ---
Yeah, I uh...I don't have an excuse for that.

TheBiscuit:

--- Quote from: gangler on 23 Aug 2011, 19:35 ---Is it? That surprises me. The concept is pretty all inclusive. Does it not tell a story at all?

--- End quote ---
I would say it does not. I would even say it makes no attempt to do so. Instead it attempts to present a series of visually stunning sequences which can be interpreted in conjunction with the novel to form a story, but no story is inherently present in the film.

No doubt many would disagree.

I will acknowledge that several individual scenes do effectively tell part of a story, but no overall story is formed and I genuinely believe it was not the intention that one should be. Regardless of this I still consider it a directorial masterpiece. I believe Kubrick achieved what he set out to do, which appears to have been the creation of an experience rather than a narrative.

There's an audience for that.

It just isn't me.

Aww... my postcount increased, and I'm not an Emoticontraindication anymore.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version